Comments for Rick Gillespie's Blog

Comment on Controversially, Physicist Argues Time Is Real — Livescience.com by martenvandijk

martenvandijk — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:09:01 +0000

Of course time is real. Lee Smolin is not original.

Comment on First Draft of a Pseudo Universe in Object Oriented View by jetsrock

jetsrock — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:05:51 +0000

Very Best of luck to the both of you.

Comment on First Draft of a Pseudo Universe in Object Oriented View by Laurent Hollo

Laurent Hollo — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:03:59 +0000

Hi Mr Gillespie,

It will be a pleasure to talk with you about these subjects.

I’m currently in the process of “connecting” Jacky Jerome’s work about the nature of mass with my own (specially with the mass defining equation M=Q2/L … see paper below)

Concerning the relativity (and discretness) of spacetime, I suggest to read my previous paper on the subject:

http://www.losangeinformatique.com/physics/dimension_of_physical_quantities.htm

In this paper, I demonstrate that [M]=L3T-2 (Maxwell’s assertion) is mathematically impossible. The results of this study are also an indication of the fractality of spacetime.

Comments and questions are welcome.

Best regards and best wishes for 2013,
Laurent Hollo

Comment on First Draft of a Pseudo Universe in Object Oriented View by Laurent

Laurent — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:56:50 +0000

Hi Mr Gillespie,

It will be a pleasure to talk to you about these subjects.
I’m in the process of “connecting” Jacky Jerome’s work on the nature of mass with my own work (and specially with the mass definition equation M=Q2/L … see paper below).

Concerning the relativity (and also the discretness) of space and time and their relation to dimensions, I suggest that some interresting information can be found in my previous article about dimensions:

http://www.losangeinformatique.com/physics/dimension_of_physical_quantities.htm

In this paper, I demonstrate that [M]=L3T-2 (as Maxwell said) is mathematically impossible. I also think that the presented concepts is an indication of the fractality of spacetime. Once the spacetime matrix concept is understood, building a program to represent the matrix, but also to find all possible equations for a given quantity, is (was) trivial.

Comments and questions are welcome.

Best regards and best wishes for 2013,
Laurent Hollo

Comment on First Draft of a Pseudo Universe in Object Oriented View by jetsrock

jetsrock — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:25:33 +0000

You my Friend are amazing. Although I didn’t get enough time to go into detail of your paper I found it very enlightening and very professional. I would love to read about how the idea of Minkowski world lines and relativity pertain to the model. Since to me they effect not only time but space. To me most things I have read recently especially from particle physicists focus on the relative nature of time and ignore the relative nature of space. It would be interesting if the concept of location in the model included possibly a relative factor that would allow the location and movement of one object to be compared to that of another.

Best Wishes,
Rick

Comment on First Draft of a Pseudo Universe in Object Oriented View by jetsrock

jetsrock — Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:43:14 +0000

Hi Sir,

I look forward to reading your pages. I am currently working on risk models and I am continuing to look into as much about this as I can. I really appreciate your correspondence and I want to wish a great new year and please feel free to contact me anytime.

Best Wishes,
Rick

Comment on First Draft of a Pseudo Universe in Object Oriented View by Laurent

Laurent — Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:34:46 +0000

Hi Mr Gillespie,

Let me first congratulate you for your very interresting blog. Asking good questions is the key to understanding and discovery, and you do it nicefully.

Concerning the object-oriented view of the universe, I’m perfectly in line with this concept as I’ve been an analyst programmer for many years, so it’s a professional bias to discern structures and operations. It is on this basis that I wrote the following article:

http://www.losangeinformatique.com/physics/ospweb.pdf

In the article, I show that all physic’s standard domains (gravitic, electric, magnetic and thermic) share an identical structure and operations, perfectly compatible with a programming mindset. I thought it could help you in your effort to “code” the universe

Comments and questions are welcome.

Best regards,
Laurent Hollo

Comment on Scientist have stated in a recent article on Space.com that faster than the speed of light travel is mathematically feasible. by Conceptual Muse

Conceptual Muse — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:35:29 +0000

Reblogged this on Extreme Physics.

Comment on What will Physics give us this Century? by jetsrock

jetsrock — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:16:44 +0000

John You are bordering on being plain mad. No need to be mean hearted due to the fact others believe all math concepts are not just folly. I have taken the time to read your paper and it is not clear enough to say you have proven anything. Keep trying but do not assume anyone beyond yourself agrees with you. I know my thoughts are not mainstream but I am not fooled into excepting I must be right and EVERYONE else is wrong. This ends my conversations with you.Best of luck.

Comment on What will Physics give us this Century? by jryskmap

jryskmap — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:29:04 +0000

You’re hopeless. People tell you things and they simply don’t sink in. All I can suggest is that you read Garciadiego. Otherwise, you’re hopeless. Whatever happens in the twenty-first century, you’ll certainly never understand it!

Ryskamp, John Henry, Paradox, Natural Mathematics, Relativity and Twentieth-Century Ideas (June 17, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=897085 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.897085